MONETARY EXPOSURE & DAMAGES ESTIMATE

Internal Strategy Document: Restricted Distribution
Date: 2025-12-21
Case: FCFCU v. CODY RICE-VELASQUEZ


🧮 PROJECTED SETTLEMENT/JUDGMENT BANDS

1. Direct Economic Damages (Strongest Evidence)

ItemEstimated Range (USD)Notes
Utilities (Post-Possession)4,000Ongoing liability; AES bills + disconnects.
Personal Property Loss1,200Mini-fridge, food, contents, replacement cost.
Electronics/Tech Impacts3,000Routers, desk equipment, re-setup costs.
Property Damage (Baseline)25,000Burst pipes, water remediation, mold cleanup.
Subtotal (Economic)33,200

2. Displacement & Consequential Damages

ItemEstimated Range (USD)Notes
Emergency Housing15,000Lodging, shelter, transit since 12/09.
Lost Productivity10,000Interruption of work/business capacity.
Roommate Displacement (Zai)6,000Secondary liability for displacing ally.
Subtotal (Consequential)31,000

3. Non-Economic Damages (Discretionary)

ItemEstimated Range (USD)Notes
Emotional Distress40,000Trauma of armed removal + sentimental loss.
ADA/Accommodation Harm20,000Failure to accommodate known disabilities.
Subtotal (Non-Economic)60,000

4. Punitive / Enhanced Exposure (Leverage)

ItemEstimated Range (USD)Notes
Willful Conduct50,000Conduct after notice of void judgment.

📊 TOTAL REALISTIC EXPOSURE SUMMARY

  • LOW-END (Conservative Court): 50,000
  • MID-RANGE (Likely Scenario): 90,000
  • HIGH-END (Disturbed Court): 150,000+

💡 STRATEGIC NOTES

  • Leverage: The goal is to anchor these numbers during negotiations and the Jan 9 hearing.
  • Remediation: Formal contractor estimates for mold/water damage will likely push the “Property Damage” category into the high-end range.
  • Mitigation: The Defendant’s denial of access locks them into these liability bands as they prevented Cody from reducing the loss.