CASE BRAIN: Strategic Decision Tree & Submission Inventory

Date: January 18, 2026 Objective: Regroup, prioritize filings, and evaluate leverage.


1. INVENTORY OF SUBMISSIONS (To Date)

StatusItemPurpose
FILEDEmergency Supplemental Declaration (Consolidated)Document initial removal harms and irreparable damage.
FILEDDeclaration: Secondary Displacement (Otis)Alert court to current homelessness crisis and predatory landlord.
PENDINGResponse to Accounting/Surplus (8-9k)Dispute their “fudged numbers” regarding home sale excess.
DRAFTINGAffidavit of Third Party HardshipDocument the “cascade” of impact on others.
PLANNEDADA / Civil Rights Formal ComplaintsApply external administrative pressure on the Plaintiff.

2. STRATEGIC DECISION TREE (Mind Map)

A. THE “SURPLUS” FORK

  1. Goal: Retrieve the ~$8.5k in excess sale proceeds.
  2. Obstacle: Plaintiff has submitted a “fudged” accounting to zero out the surplus.
  3. Action: Submit “Audit Response” detailing utility exploitation and bad faith property damage.

B. THE “DISMISSAL” LEVERAGE FORK

  • Path 1: File Motion to Dismiss (Total Dismissal)
    • Pros: Forces them to restart (very expensive for them). Validates procedural errors.
    • Cons: Might kill current “leverage” if the goal is a comprehensive settlement. Could reset everything (including your ability to claim current damages in this specific case number).
  • Path 2: File for Sanctions/Stay (Maintain Leverage)
    • Pros: Keeps the current case open as a “vessel” for your damage claims. Forces them to “come to the table” to make the noise stop.
    • Decision: Option 2 is generally better for settlement. Total dismissal lets them walk away and try again cleaner. Sanctions make them pay for their current mess.

C. THE “ADA / CIVIL RIGHTS” PRESSURE FORK

  • Tactical Goal: Do NOT make the government agencies part of this case (don’t complicate the hearing).
  • Action: Send letter to Plaintiff: “I have filed formal complaints with HUD/Indiana Civil Rights Commission. Expect a call.”
  • Effect: Their legal costs jump $20k+ just to respond. This accelerates the “How much do you want to go away?” conversation.

3. MASTER CHECKLIST: STABILIZATION & FILING

Section 1: IMMEDIATE (Next 24 Hours)

  • Stabilize Housing: Secure hotel with kitchenette (4-week fund).
  • Finalize Surplus Response: Detail the 12/9 video evidence (Abbott tampering).
  • Re-verify Utilities: Document that Plaintiff is using power/water on Defendant’s dime.

Section 2: STRATEGIC FILINGS (This Week)

  • Supplemental Damage Accounting: Total up hotel costs, food, time lost, work inability ($ amount).
  • Affidavits: Secure “Hardship” statements from affected third parties.
  • ADA/Civil Rights Letters: Send notice of filing to Plaintiff.

Section 3: THE “BIG ASK” (Hearing Jan 9/19)

  • Request appointment of attorney (ADA Accommodation).
  • Demand immediate release of undisputed surplus funds.
  • Present “Narration Log” as evidence of Plaintiff’s bad faith behavior.

4. DAMAGE TOTALING SUMMARY (Target Matrix)

  • Liquid Damages: Hotel stays (300+/mo).
  • Property Loss: TV damage (Video 46), Fridge/Mold risk, Locks/Locksmith.
  • Labor/Opportunity Cost: Time lost preparing pro se (hundreds of hours), Inability to work due to instability.
  • Statutory Damages: ADA violations, Illegal removal procedures.

strategy mindmap inventory decision_tree leverage settlement ADA surplus