CASE BRAIN: Strategic Decision Tree & Submission Inventory
Date: January 18, 2026 Objective: Regroup, prioritize filings, and evaluate leverage.
1. INVENTORY OF SUBMISSIONS (To Date)
| Status | Item | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| FILED | Emergency Supplemental Declaration (Consolidated) | Document initial removal harms and irreparable damage. |
| FILED | Declaration: Secondary Displacement (Otis) | Alert court to current homelessness crisis and predatory landlord. |
| PENDING | Response to Accounting/Surplus (8-9k) | Dispute their “fudged numbers” regarding home sale excess. |
| DRAFTING | Affidavit of Third Party Hardship | Document the “cascade” of impact on others. |
| PLANNED | ADA / Civil Rights Formal Complaints | Apply external administrative pressure on the Plaintiff. |
2. STRATEGIC DECISION TREE (Mind Map)
A. THE “SURPLUS” FORK
- Goal: Retrieve the ~$8.5k in excess sale proceeds.
- Obstacle: Plaintiff has submitted a “fudged” accounting to zero out the surplus.
- Action: Submit “Audit Response” detailing utility exploitation and bad faith property damage.
B. THE “DISMISSAL” LEVERAGE FORK
- Path 1: File Motion to Dismiss (Total Dismissal)
- Pros: Forces them to restart (very expensive for them). Validates procedural errors.
- Cons: Might kill current “leverage” if the goal is a comprehensive settlement. Could reset everything (including your ability to claim current damages in this specific case number).
- Path 2: File for Sanctions/Stay (Maintain Leverage)
- Pros: Keeps the current case open as a “vessel” for your damage claims. Forces them to “come to the table” to make the noise stop.
- Decision: Option 2 is generally better for settlement. Total dismissal lets them walk away and try again cleaner. Sanctions make them pay for their current mess.
C. THE “ADA / CIVIL RIGHTS” PRESSURE FORK
- Tactical Goal: Do NOT make the government agencies part of this case (don’t complicate the hearing).
- Action: Send letter to Plaintiff: “I have filed formal complaints with HUD/Indiana Civil Rights Commission. Expect a call.”
- Effect: Their legal costs jump $20k+ just to respond. This accelerates the “How much do you want to go away?” conversation.
3. MASTER CHECKLIST: STABILIZATION & FILING
Section 1: IMMEDIATE (Next 24 Hours)
- Stabilize Housing: Secure hotel with kitchenette (4-week fund).
- Finalize Surplus Response: Detail the 12/9 video evidence (Abbott tampering).
- Re-verify Utilities: Document that Plaintiff is using power/water on Defendant’s dime.
Section 2: STRATEGIC FILINGS (This Week)
- Supplemental Damage Accounting: Total up hotel costs, food, time lost, work inability ($ amount).
- Affidavits: Secure “Hardship” statements from affected third parties.
- ADA/Civil Rights Letters: Send notice of filing to Plaintiff.
Section 3: THE “BIG ASK” (Hearing Jan 9/19)
- Request appointment of attorney (ADA Accommodation).
- Demand immediate release of undisputed surplus funds.
- Present “Narration Log” as evidence of Plaintiff’s bad faith behavior.
4. DAMAGE TOTALING SUMMARY (Target Matrix)
- Liquid Damages: Hotel stays (300+/mo).
- Property Loss: TV damage (Video 46), Fridge/Mold risk, Locks/Locksmith.
- Labor/Opportunity Cost: Time lost preparing pro se (hundreds of hours), Inability to work due to instability.
- Statutory Damages: ADA violations, Illegal removal procedures.
strategy mindmap inventory decision_tree leverage settlement ADA surplus